Trust & Governance

Trust is built by making the boundaries visible.

RTH spans education, publishing, community impact, research development, youth resources, commerce, and responsible technology. Each area carries different responsibilities. This center explains the public principles RTH uses to keep evidence, privacy, accessibility, youth protection, entity responsibilities, and technology claims appropriately separated.

Core principles

What visitors should be able to understand without reading fine print.

Privacy & data minimization

RTH collects only information appropriate to the public workflow being used. General website forms are not intended for medical records, personal health information, emergency requests, or unnecessary sensitive information about children.

Evidence before certainty

RTH distinguishes established guidance, peer-reviewed evidence, RTH synthesis, founder observation, hypotheses, prototypes, and validated results. Claim strength should never exceed evidence strength.

Responsible AI

RTH technology is designed around provenance, uncertainty, bounded automation, task-specific validation, and human review at consequential boundaries rather than presenting AI as an all-purpose professional authority.

Youth protection

Youth-facing pathways prioritize age-appropriate education, adult-supported contact, data minimization, strengths-based participation, and separation of children’s educational activities from health-data processing.

Accessibility

The public site targets WCAG 2.2 Level AA and is designed around keyboard access, visible focus, readable contrast, responsive reflow, reduced motion, semantic structure, and a practical path to report barriers.

Clear responsibility

Commercial activity, community-impact activity, research development, educational content, and technology development are not treated as interchangeable. RTH identifies the responsible pathway and preserves the limitations appropriate to each.

One ecosystem, different responsibilities

Governance follows the work—not just the brand name.

A book purchase, a child-facing lesson, a research hypothesis, a community program, and a technology workflow do not create the same risks. RTH applies different controls according to the activity, audience, data, intended use, and level of consequence.

Public education

Books, blogs, resources & speaking

Educational content should be understandable, sourced where appropriate, accessible, and clear about the difference between general education, lived experience, and professional advice.

Commerce

Products, publishing & transactions

Commercial transactions belong to the applicable RTH LLC pathway and should use accurate product status, pricing, fulfillment, return, privacy, and payment disclosures.

Community impact

RTH Initiative

Community-impact and charitable activity is separated from commercial transactions. Dedicated nonprofit pathways should clearly identify giving, volunteering, programs, accountability, and receipting when those functions are available.

Science & research

Neurocardiac Model™ / Method™

The Neurocardiac Model is presented as an evidence-informed, hypothesis-generating framework. Research questions, founder observations, methods, and validated findings must remain distinguishable as the evidence base develops.

Responsible technology

SuperstarIQ

SuperstarIQ remains in development and validation. Public positioning does not authorize diagnosis, treatment, prediction, emergency monitoring, implanted-device interpretation, or return-to-play decisions.

Children & schools

Heart Heroes & educator resources

Youth materials use age-appropriate education and participation rather than medical, mental-health, character, worth, or resilience scoring. Child-sensitive information is minimized and separated from general public forms.

Research and claims

Lived experience can identify a question. It cannot, by itself, answer the question for everyone.

The founder’s longitudinal experience is an important origin point for RTH, but founder observations are labeled as observations. Population-level conclusions require appropriate evidence, methods, validation, professional review, and—where applicable—research and regulatory oversight.

Explore Research & Evidence →

Public notices

Policies for the current public RTH experience.

These notices address the current public website, accessibility commitments, medical and educational boundaries, and youth safeguards. Additional product-, program-, commerce-, research-, and entity-specific agreements apply as those workflows are activated.

Privacy Policy

Current public-site data collection, technical processing, forms, commerce context, and privacy requests.

Accessibility

Accessibility target, design commitments, communication options, and barrier-reporting pathway.

Youth Privacy

Adult-supported contact, data minimization, child-sensitive information limits, and youth-specific safeguards.